Monday, 26 September 2016

Racism in the United States Nurtures “Lone Wolves”

Beirut – The United States witnessed during the weekend three terrorist attacks in the states of Minnesota, New York, and New Jersey. These attacks seemed to be inspired from ISIS and pointed to the expansion of operations initiated by “Lone Wolves” amid the growing polarization and anti-Islamic calls incented by the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.


Three attacks during 12 hours; bombing operations in the streets of New York and New Jersey and a knife-stabbing attack in a mall in Minnesota, which spread fear among U.S. citizens.


A bomb exploded in a garbage container in New Jersey, followed by another bombing attack that struck Manhattan in New York and killed 29 people and a stabbing attack implemented by a man who targeted nine people while screaming “Allah Akbar” in Crossroad Mall. According to ISIS’s Telegram Channel, this attack came as a response to the extremist organization’s call to target citizens of countries partaking in the “Crusades” U.S.-led International Coalition to combat ISIS.


On another hand, security forces have killed the stabber Ahmad Khan Rahami and found a journal among his belongings which revealed that his attacks of New York were inspired by Al-Qaeda and ISIS; it also disclosed ideological links between him and Abu Mohammad Al-Adnani, late spokesperson of ISIS.


According to Dr. Matthew Levitt, from The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, ISIS has clearly called its supporters to carry on individual attacks based on the “Lone Wolves” strategy anywhere in the world; in a handbook “’How to Survive in the West” published by the terrorist organization on the internet in 2015, ISIS has said that the growth of lone wolves’ attacks will obstruct western intelligence agencies from controlling the spread of violence and chaos in their countries.


During an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Alex Ward, a security expert explains that it has become obvious now that extremists have been directed to implement individual attacks (lone wolves) more than any other time; availability of technologies and information for all people provides lone wolves members with constant capacity to launch any attack for any reason.


In fact, attacks over New York and New Jersey have triggered interested significances; according to Levitt, people will witness more attacks launched by a sole attacker (people who act independently) and that such attacks may be implemented by people who are not related to each other.


On another hand, Levitt also sees that ISIS may seek to carry out more opportunistic attacks of proved success. He adds that the organization has adopted terrorist operations which it did not implement, like Orlando’s shooting attack in Florida and the operation of Nice. Levitt concludes that ISIS may prefer to adopt only operations that succeed; despite that New York’s attacks can be considered as successful; given that it provoked fear among people for few days.


The rise of polarization and unfair behaviors toward Muslim communities may encourage on launching new attacks over U.S. territories. Lately, the Republican candidate Donald Trump has maximized his racist speeches against Muslims; in 2015, Trump called for the first time for a complete closure of borders to ban Muslims from entering the United States; back then, Trump’s extremism and his suggestion of a ban against Muslims helped him win the adoption as an official republican candidate, despite his accusation of religious fanaticism.


This week, Trump’s older sun has made headlines on social media after he compared Syrian refugees with Skittles fruit candy; Trump the son outlined that the United States should refuse refugees’ access to its territories; the candidate’s son has shared an image for a bowl of candies with the following question: “if I tell you that this bowl contains three candies that will kill you, would you take a handful of them?”


Finally, hatred feelings toward the United States have increased across the Islamic World; thus, the growth of polarized and extremist speeches that target Muslims will definitely aggravate enmity against USA. The polarizing communities tend to provoke severe reactions and violence levels that may reach terrorism.



Racism in the United States Nurtures “Lone Wolves”

Coalition Tells Yemen Insurgents: No Border Ceasefire

Aden, Riyadh-In a new maneuver, rebels controlling the Yemeni capital Sana’a have suggested “a border ceasefire” with Saudi Arabia, if the Arab Coalition halts its airstrikes against the insurgents.


However, the Saudi-led coalition on Monday rejected the proposal, which was made by the head of the so-called Supreme Political Council.


Coalition spokesperson Major General Ahmed Asiri said: “If Houthis want to have a ceasefire they know what they have to do,” referring to the peace initiative proposed last month by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.


Kerry’s initiative calls on rebels to withdraw from seized areas including Sana’a, which they have held since 2014.


Earlier, Saleh al-Samad, the chief of the so-called Houthi-backed political council, said in a speech that in exchange of stopping the aggression against Yemen by land, sea and air, and of stopping the air strikes and lifting what he called “the siege,” Houthis will halt combat operations on the border and put an end to missile attacks on Saudi Arabia.


However, Asiri said the coalition welcomes “any effort to have a genuine political settlement” instead of a “short ceasefire without any control, without any observation.”


Samad also requested an amnesty for Yemeni fighters allied to the National Army and the Popular Resistance if the Kingdom stopped air strikes and lifted a near blockade on the country.


Meanwhile, Yemen’s President Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi launched a verbal attack on ousted President Ali Abdullah Saleh, accusing him of handing over Yemen to Iran.


“Today, Yemenis are totally aware that Aden would not be stable or secure and that Sana’a would not be recuperated in the presence of a cavern, a chopper and an Imam,” he said.


Addressing the people of Yemen on the 54th national anniversary of Yemen’s September 26 Revolution, Hadi said the Iranian sectarian scheme has no place among free Yemenis.


The president said that the struggle of heroic Yemenis in the past two years was a major obstacle to the rebellious plan, which targets the entire region.


He said the obvious hostility shown by the Houthis and their ousted ally against the national project and their rejection of the outputs of the national dialogue is similar to the position of their forerunners against the Constitution of 1948.


Meanwhile, rebels’ media outlets have documented an widening gap between Saleh and the Houthis due to several reasons, mainly a dispute concerning the authorities of the so-called Higher Political Council.



Coalition Tells Yemen Insurgents: No Border Ceasefire

King Salman Chairs Saudi National Cabinet Session

Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz, also known as The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, chaired a national cabinet session on Sep. 26 at Al-Yamamah Palace in Riyadh.


Kicking off the session, King Salman commended the success and safety of this year’s Hajj pilgrimage– pilgrims were able to complete all Hajj-related rituals safely and comfortably, visiting all holy sites especially at the Grand Holy Mosque.


King Salman expressed appreciation for exertions of Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince, also directing thanks to all personnel in civil, military and national sectors who contributed to the success of this year’s Hajj season.


According to the Saudi state news agency SPA, The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques recognized the efforts of leaders, senior Islamic figures, guest government agencies and heads of Hajj missions. Alternatively, all those affiliated to this year’s pilgrimage had expressed deep appreciation of what has been provided by the Kingdom of services to pilgrims.


On the special occasion of the Kingdom celebrating its 86th National Day anniversary, the cabinet session commended national security and stability, in addition to the witnessed growth and prosperity in all aspects of life in Saudi Arabia.


The Cabinet highlighted what was previously stated by the Crown Prince when heading the Kingdom’s delegation at the 71st annual session at the UN General concerning national stance on fighting terrorism, and contributing to the achievement of international peace, security and stability.


Moreover, the session welcomed all resolutions on Yemen and Syria presented by Arab foreign ministers at the 146th session held in Cairo.


The national Saudi body lauded all exertions of security authorities which aided in thwarting terrorist operations linked to ISIS and other terror organization.



King Salman Chairs Saudi National Cabinet Session

U.S. Air Forces Central Command Spokesman: We Will Continue to Eradicate ISIS

Dubai- Lt. Col. Chris Karns, spokesman for U.S. Air Forces Central Command, said that the coalition forces are currently focusing on killing leaders of ISIS. “The coalition has already made several achievements during the previous period,” Karns said during an interview with Asharq al-Awsat.


“The coalition forces succeeded in reducing the terrorist group ability; they liberated 50% of the territories which were previously ruled by ISIS in Iraq, of course in cooperation with local forces, in addition to 22% to 24% in Syria,” he added.


The spokesman said that the coalition forces are exerting restless efforts to cut supplies to ISIS and to make use of these weapons and tools to help local forces in Mosul and Raqqa.


“It should be understood that liberating Mosul and Raqqa does not mean eradicating ISIS since this still needs a lot of time. We can’t, yet, announce victory,” he added.


Karns declared that the emphasis is currently on the events taking place in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. “The problem is not restricted to the region. As a matter of fact it is a world problem and that’s why a world solution is required far from the military one. The military solution helps in reaching the final stage but is not sufficient without the diplomatic solution. When we talk about a solution in Iraq, we mean that the Iraqi government must be the godfather of the solution,” Karns continued.


The spokesperson said that ISIS members used civilians as human shields to protect themselves in some Iraqi regions and settled in houses and schools. “It is essential that these places be discovered because Mosul and Raqqa are significant regions and ISIS will fight fiercely to remain there. This is going to be a challenge,” continued Karns.


“At the end of the day these two regions will be liberated. Some successes have already been achieved. I would like to clarify that the coalition forces presence on the ground is essential because the enemy is ISIS and its members who are committing vicious crimes are not abiding by any international laws. For this, ISIS will exert tremendous efforts to maintain control over these territories”, he said.


“We focused on attacking Mosul and Raqqa in coincidence with other regions to make ISIS lose its balance. When ISIS commits mistakes such as these that happened in Fallujah, we make use of these mistakes to defeat the group. I expect upcoming victories against ISIS in more regions”, Karns stated.


Karns said that the ongoing work in Raqqa is an intelligence one; daily investigations are being carried out to get to know the enemy’s upcoming steps. “Besides this, we are carrying out attacks in Raqqa,” he added.


Speaking of the cooperation with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries, Karns said that “We have cooperated with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf, within a long-term relation… We are trying to obtain maximum advantage of countries, whether in military attacks or currently the intelligence activity, to reach tangible results in Syria and Iraq.”


When asked what message he would like to deliver to ISIS supporters, he advised them to “discover the nature of this enemy that is stealing people, using innocent people as human shields and has bad intentions against individuals who don’t believe in it or don’t show interest to join it.”


Karns concluded, “We are committed to win this war, to defeat ISIS and to assist our friends because we are partners and will always be fully prepared to offer them help.”



U.S. Air Forces Central Command Spokesman: We Will Continue to Eradicate ISIS

Maliki Accused of Benefiting from Inter-Kurdish Disagreements

Baghdad – Head of Patriotic Union of Kurdistan Bloc Alaa Talbani was so eager to announce her no-confidence vote against Minister of Finance Hoshyar Zebari, that she raised her ballot high in the parliament although it was a secret vote.


Member of Kurdistan Democratic Party Arafat Akram said that what happened to Zebari was a political mockery and a political assassination attempt.


Concerning the vote of certain Kurdish MPs, Akram was surprised and said it was the first time that Kurdish deputies didn’t agree on a decision.


The issue doesn’t end here; it may even have just begun. At the time Nouri Maliki is being accused of using the inter-Kurdish conflicts for his personal interest to set old accounts straight with Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani, Maliki rejected all accusations and derogatory comments against him.


Maliki said that he will not rest until the last corrupted politician is out of the political process in Iraq.


While Maliki is presenting himself as the sponsor of reform, which began over a year ago with PM Haidar al-Abadi, MP Mouwafaq al-Rabiehi told Asharq Al-Awsat that he considers Zebari more of a minister of the division of shares than a corrupt official.


He added that Zebari is part of the division of shares that should be eradicated from the government. Thus, this matter lies within the hands of the Minister of Foreign Affairs Ibrahim al-Jaafari.


Over a month ago, Jaafari lost the head of National Council to head of Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq Ammar al-Hakim. Head of National Council is considered a symbolic position and ranks higher than the prime minister. Therefore, it will be hard for him to lose an important ministry like the foreign ministry.


What didn’t Rabiehi consider is that at the time resignation of certain ministers or no-confidence vote aims to overcome division of shares, division of shares itself still limits Abadi and prevents him from assigning new ministers.


Due to his disagreement with Badr bloc, Abadi is not able to assign a new minister following minister of Interior Mohammed al-Ghabban, who resigned months ago. Similarly, Abadi hadn’t been able to assign a new Minister of Defense following Khalid al-Obeidi at a time Iraqi Army undergoes heavy clashes with ISIS terrorist organization.


Kurdistan Democratic Party seems to only be concerned with throwing accusations at Maliki, whereas Maliki seems careless as he considered it a personal victory to sack Zebari.


On the issue, Maliki said that if any minister discharged for corruption was going to hold a press conference to give false allegations against the head of largest parliamentary bloc, then Maliki welcomes those abusive words until the last corrupt official is out of office.


Kurdish leader Arafat Akram said that Speaker Salim al-Jabbouri had collaborated with Maliki, yet MP Mohammed al-Karbouli said this was not true and Jabbouri had nothing to do with these issues. He added that as everyone knows, Jabbouri acts as the speaker of the parliament.


But, Akram said that what happened was a conspiracy led by Maliki with Jabbouri paving its way to topple Abadi’s government.


Akram pointed out that no one is answering what happened to $120 billion lost in Mosul during the time of Maliki. He feared that Iraq will turn into a tyrant state of single ideology.


For his part, MP of National Union Front Shuwwan Dawoudi said that the front agreed on a no-confidence vote against Zebari.


Commenting on the claims that Maliki is benefiting from the disagreements within the Kurdistan region, Dawoudi said that it is more appropriate to ask who caused them in the first place.



Maliki Accused of Benefiting from Inter-Kurdish Disagreements

Barcelona’s AndrĂ©s Iniesta: ‘I Was a Victim of Something That Terrified Me’

Andrés Iniesta says he heard the silence and knew that all he had to do was wait for Isaac Newton. The ball sat up; gravity would bring it down again and, when it did, he would score. It was the 116th minute in Johannesburg and he did score, running to the corner and pulling off his shirt to reveal the message underneath, written in blue marker by Hugo the kit man: “Dani Jarque, always with us”. Ten thousand miles away Spain erupted and Jessica cried. Through the tears she saw it: Dani, her Dani.


The 2010 World Cup final was the first game Jessica had watched since her husband had died 11 months earlier, aged 26. She watched on television with her mother, María, and daughter, Martina, 10 months, as the ball sat up. What followed was more than just a goal, Iniesta reveals – for all of them. It is sunny in Sant Joan Despí as, six years on, he explains how that moment pulled him from “a dark place”.


Iniesta might not have been there then and without that goal he does not know where he would be now. Perhaps not here at Barcelona’s training ground, one of the world’s most celebrated footballers. Late on the night before the final, with everyone asleep, he quietly opened the door and, without leaving the hotel, set off for a run. Down the corridors he sprinted until he believed he could do this. All tournament the physios, working past 4am, had promised he would be OK even when they thought he would not be. Now, he was – vulnerable but ready.


This was more than Iniesta’s muscles, though; it was his mind. The security of waiting for Newton masked the insecurity and suffering of the months before. In 2009 he won the European Cup and the following summer the World Cup. It should have been the best year of his life; instead it was the hardest. Between the two titles he suffered. “Not depression exactly, not illness either, not really, but an unease,” he says in his book, The Artist, published today. “It was like nothing was right.”


Iniesta had played the 2009 final injured, warned not to shoot. In pre-season, still not fit, Carles Puyol delivered news: his friend Jarque, captain of Espanyol, had died. The impact was profound, body and mind suffering together. Tests showed nothing specific physically but Iniesta could not complete sessions, Pep Guardiola telling him to walk whenever he needed, which he did often. They would wait, Guardiola said, and the wait went on. When Iniesta played he was not the same and April brought another injury. The World Cup, the light he sought, risked being extinguished.


Iniesta says he had felt as if he was in “freefall”. Unable to go on, he turned to the club’s doctors, seeking professional psychological treatment. If doing so can carry a stigma, especially in sport, he says: “When you need help, you have to look for it: at times it’s necessary. People are specialists; that’s what they’re there for. You have to use them.”


So Iniesta did – quietly, privately. He needed help; he talks about being “on edge”, “vulnerable”, “victim of something that terrified me”. Team-mates did not know. Nor had he said anything publicly. There is a kind of catharsis, or perhaps a closure, in doing so now. He had talked about Newton before but not what lay beneath, how significant that moment was. What would have become of him without it? What if Spain had not won the World Cup? It is not a glib question.


Despite his reluctance to define what he suffered as “depression”, there is a passage in his book where Iniesta writes that he can “understand” how people end up committing a “locura”: how they can end up doing something “crazy”, an act of “madness”. What does he mean? In the context it is a powerful word, frightening and uncomfortable: mental health can be delicate, the desperation debilitating and the consequences dreadful.


“When you’re not right, you experience moments that impact upon you, that worry you,” Iniesta says. His words – te imponen respeto – defy simplistic translation but imply fear, a sense of the situation being bigger than you, beyond you, not entirely under control. “Those are difficult, uncomfortable moments [but] to go from there to certain extremes,” he says, “… well, every case has its peculiarities…”


“There are moments when your mind is very vulnerable. You feel a lot of doubts. Every person is different, every case. What I’m trying to explain is that you can go from being in good shape to being in a bad way very quickly.


“I never reached the point of saying: ‘I’m giving up.’ I understood that I was enduring a delicate moment but I took refuge in my people and, above all, in football. I never felt I didn’t want to continue playing. I knew one day I’d take a step forward, maybe the next it would be three, then five … it’s a process and that’s how you overcome it.


“People see footballers as different beings, as if we’re untouchable, as if nothing ever happens to us, but we’re people. Of course we’re privileged but in the tangibles we’re the same.”


The same? Or perhaps even worse off? Does the exposure, the pressure, the competition and need to perform, the public profile, make it harder? And few jobs expose people so young. The response is swift: “We’re not martyrs,” Iniesta says. “Lots of people would swap with us. Every job has its difficulties. Every time my dad, a builder, went up on the scaffolding, he could have fallen. But he accepts that risk; he had to. Or the lorry driver, or any job… the footballer knows; he grows up with pressure, criticism, having to be strong. I’m convinced there are many who wouldn’t make it.”


Iniesta left home to join Barcelona as a 12-year-old, crying alone in a corner daily. He says the worst night of his life was the first he spent at La Masia while his parents drove back to Fuentealbilla, Albacete in a Ford Orion that kept breaking down.


“We’re lucky to be footballers; my intention in explaining that bad moment is not to make people say ‘poor thing’, far from it. Just that elements of [a footballer’s] life, the feelings, the difficulties, are like anyone else’s. This is how people’s lives are. I don’t think I’m an exception. It costs una barbariedad – a colossal amount – to get to the first team and even more to stay there. I spent my whole life at Barcelona, living with the pressure from the age of 12. But you’re born a footballer, wanting to be one, so it doesn’t matter how old you are.”


For almost a year it was as if he was not one, his identity lost. South Africa brought him through and brought him here; Iniesta admits that it allowed him to “feel like a footballer again”.


Some footballer: captain of Barcelona, universally admired, the man of whom Lionel Messi says that, when there is a problem on the pitch, the thing he wants most is to have Andrés close. Winner of over 30 titles; two trebles; every trophy there is; a European Cup winner in 2006 (although he admits that Frank Rijkaard’s handling of the final, which he began on the bench, “doesn’t sit well at all”), 2009, 2011 and 2015; a European champion in 2008 and 2012; World champion in 2010, scorer of that goal.


And he is not about to stop. At 32, no longer playing alongside Xavi Hernández and with Barcelona embarking on a stylistic shift, more direct, it might have been natural for Iniesta’s career to draw towards a close. He might have appeared the natural victim; instead he is enjoying this as never before. He became more central in every sense, a kind of Iniesta and Xavi.


The qualities that define him have not diminished; his game is, he says, “intuitive”. Recognizably his: summed up in a photo surrounded by opponents, bigger and more numerous than him. Almost as if it is deliberate, drawing them in, even if he protests: “I prefer one than five!” He explains: “I’ve never seen being small as a disadvantage; everyone has his qualities. Don’t ask me to beat a guy who’s 1.80m in the air: ask me to do other things I’m better than him at.


“Most things come from inside, they’re intuitive; that’s the way I am. There’s tactics, strategy but I understand football as something unpredictable, because you have to decide in a thousandth of a second. If the ball is coming and there’s someone behind you, I’m not thinking: ‘I’m going left or should it be right?’ I just go and it comes off … well, sometimes it doesn’t.”


From across the room a friend is listening. “It always does,” he shouts, laughing. Iniesta squirms a bit and heads in another direction.


“Things have changed a bit but the essence will always be the same,” he says. “Everything evolves and changes need time: we didn’t play as well in September [2014] as in [the final] in the 2015 final in Berlin. The style is a product of the players; you have to use [Messi, Neymar, and Suárez] and maybe the midfielders have more pitch to cover, but I’m not someone who can only play a certain style or system. Last year was one of the seasons I most enjoyed. I broke my kilometer record, for sure, but that’s not incompatible with my style.”


The balance under Luis Enrique bears that out: a treble and a double. Now as they begin another season, a familiar face stands before them in the Champions League: one that looked out from posters by Iniesta’s bunk. The coach who changed the club and changed his career – and whose career Iniesta changed too. Barcelona versus Manchester City: it is not the draw they wanted but better now than a knock-out. And the reunion will be a fond one


After two games under Guardiola in 2008 Barcelona had not won and the pressure was huge. Why they had chosen this novice over José Mourinho? One day there was a knock on Guardiola’s door. It was Iniesta. “Keep going, mister. We’re training bloody brilliantly,” he said


“Things hadn’t started well but I believed in [Guardiola],” Iniesta says. “I felt a connection. When things come from inside, you know they’re real. I felt that way, like I had to tell him, support him.


“We came back from Euro 2008 and went to St Andrews and you could already see that this was different: the training, the communication, how the manager was. Until then there hadn’t been such a defined style and I identified with it. It changed everything and we needed that.


“Since then, if you watch, there are things other coaches have taken on that weren’t done until then: the central defenders coming out to play, or the full-backs. Pulling the pivot further back to begin [moves]. In sessions, instead of the two interiors coming back to receive, he pushed us further forward for the next wave, supporting players higher, offering passing options. You could only come so far; you can’t go past this line,” Iniesta says, signaling the limits with his hand. “And they’d watch to make sure, or there’d be cones marking out [that limit].


“All those ideas were expressed early in sessions. Or, the pressure on the ball after losing possession… There’d be drills where, if the opposition plays six passes without you getting it off them, they get a point.” Or the goalkeeper? “Yes, he’s always been important for us, another player: when the ball comes out from deep, depending on whether your opponents have one or two [forwards], the goalkeeper plays. He allows you to have numerical superiority.”


Joe Hart has found that out already. But will Guardiola’s philosophy work in Manchester? “Pep knows how to adapt and I’m sure he’ll do so in England,” Iniesta says. “He’s also got staff like Mikel Arteta who’ll help that process, who know the league.


“City have signed well and have a very competitive squad. I know Nolito well because he was a team-mate here at Barcelona and with Spain. He’s had a great start and hopefully can continue. I’ve admired David Silva for years: I think he’s exceptional. Players learn day to day, from experience, team-mates and managers. I learnt a lot with Pep; he helped me to improve and he’ll do the same at City.”


Above all, though, Guardiola wanted Iniesta to be Iniesta, not least during those months when he was not. Because when Iniesta is himself, he is unique. Fuentealbilla with his friends is not the same as the Camp Nou with 98,000 fans – “If only,” he says – but while the stage marks you, the pressure too, some things remain. “What I do in the stadium, I did on the school playground,” Barcelona’s captain says. “What I did at 12, I still do now.”


(The Guardian)



Barcelona’s Andrés Iniesta: ‘I Was a Victim of Something That Terrified Me’

Fresh Strikes Hit Aleppo as Supplies Dwindle

Warplanes again pounded rebel-held areas of Syria’s Aleppo on Monday as residents warned of increasing shortages of food and medicine after an emergency session of the U.N. Security Council on the country ended with no action.


An AFP correspondent in the battered city said a wave of strikes hit areas of the opposition-controlled east of the city from dawn, in particular the Al-Mashhad and Sayf al-Dawla districts, sparking large fires.


The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitor, said “dozens of raids” had hit districts of east Aleppo after midnight on Sunday, with many wounded and at least two civilians killed.


It was the fourth day of intense air raids on the city since a defiant Syrian regime launched a new assault to retake all of Aleppo following the collapse of a short-lived ceasefire brokered by Russia and the United States.


The Observatory said Monday that at least 128 people, nearly all civilians, had been killed in Syrian and Russian raids on eastern Aleppo since late Thursday. Among the dead were 20 children and nine women.


At least 36 civilians, including 11 children and five women, were killed in raids targeting rural areas of Aleppo province, said Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman.


A medical source in rebel-held Aleppo said hospitals were struggling to deal with a huge number of casualties as supplies dwindled.


“Hospitals that are still in service are under a lot of pressure due to the significant number of wounded in recent days, and the major shortage of blood,” the source told AFP. “Because of this, serious injuries are requiring immediate amputations.”


With Aleppo back under siege since regime forces again fully surrounded the city in early September, residents were having to deal with food shortages and skyrocketing prices as well as the increased violence.


Aleppo, divided since mid-2012 between regime control in the west and rebel control in the east, has seen some of its worst fighting in years over the last week, raising widespread international concern.


The Security Council met in an emergency session on Sunday to address the fighting, with Britain, France and the United States demanding Russia rein its Syrian ally.


During the session, the U.S. accused Russia of “barbarism” in Syria.


All three Western powers heaped blame on Moscow for supporting the offensive by the head of the Syrian regime, Bashar Assad.


Moscow also said ending the civil war was almost “impossible.”



Fresh Strikes Hit Aleppo as Supplies Dwindle